File PDF .it

Condividi facilmente i tuoi documenti PDF con i tuoi contatti, il Web e i Social network.

Inviare un file File manager Cassetta degli attrezzi Ricerca PDF Assistenza Contattaci



Lynn White.pdf


Anteprima del file PDF lynn-white.pdf

Pagina 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Anteprima testo


The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis
Lynn White, Jr.
A conversation with Aldous Huxley not infrequently put one at the
receiving end of an unforgettable monologue. About a year before his
lamented death he was discoursing on a favorite topic: Man's unnatural
treatment of nature and its sad results. To illustrate his point he told how,
during the previous summer, he had returned to a little valley in England
where he had spent many happy months as a child. Once it had been
composed of delightful grassy glades; now it was becoming overgrown with
unsightly brush because the rabbits that formerly kept such growth under
control had largely succumbed to a disease, myxomatosis, that was
deliberately introduced by the local farmers to reduce the rabbits'
destruction of crops. Being something of a Philistine, I could be silent no
longer, even in the interests of great rhetoric. I interrupted to point out that
the rabbit itself had been brought as a domestic animal to England in 1176,
presumably to improve the protein diet of the peasantry.
All forms of life modify their contexts. The most spectacular and
benign instance is doubtless the coral polyp. By serving its own ends, it has
created a vast undersea world favorable to thousands of other kinds of
animals and plants. Ever since man became a numerous species he has
affected his environment notably. The hypothesis that his fire-drive method
of hunting created the world's great grasslands and helped to exterminate
the monster mammals of the Pleistocene from much of the globe is
plausible, if not proved. For 6 millennia at least, the banks of the lower Nile
have been a human artifact rather than the swampy African jungle which
nature, apart from man, would have made it. The Aswan Dam, flooding
5000 square miles, is only the latest stage in a long process. In many
regions terracing or irrigation, overgrazing, the cutting of forests by
Romans to build ships to fight Carthaginians or by Crusaders to solve the
logistics problems of their expeditions, have profoundly changed some
ecologies. Observation that the French landscape falls into two basic types,
the open fields of the north and the bocage of the south and west, inspired
Marc Bloch to undertake his classic study of medieval agricultural methods.
Quite unintentionally, changes in human ways often affect nonhuman
nature. It has been noted, for example, that the advent of the automobile
eliminated huge flocks of sparrows that once fed on the horse manure
littering every street.

The history of ecologic change is still so rudimentary that we know
little about what really happened, or what the results were. The extinction of
the European aurochs as late as 1627 would seem to have been a simple
case of overenthusiastic hunting. On more intricate matters it often is
impossible to find solid information. For a thousand years or more the
Frisians and Hollanders have been pushing back the North Sea, and the
process is culminating in our own time in the reclamation of the Zuider Zee.
What, if any, species of animals, birds, fish, shore life, or plants have died
out in the process? In their epic combat with Neptune have the
Netherlanders overlooked ecological values in such a way that the quality of
human life in the Netherlands has suffered? I cannot discover that the
ques tions have ever been asked, much less answered.
People, then, have often been a dynamic element in their own
environment, but in the present state of historical scholarship we usually do
not know exactly when, where, or with what effects man-induced changes
came. As we enter the last third of the 20th century, however, concern for
the problem of ecologic backlash is mounting feverishly. Natural science,
conceived as the effort to understand the nature of things, had flourished in
several eras and among several peoples. Similarly there had been an age-old
accumulation of technological skills, sometimes growing rapidly,
sometimes slowly. But it was not until about four generations ago that
Western Europe and North America arranged a marriage between science
and technology, a union of the theoretical and the empirical approaches to
our natural environment. The emergence in widespread practice of the
Baconian creed that scientific knowledge means technological power over
nature can scarcely be dated before about 1850, save in the chemical
industries, where it is anticipated in the 18th century. Its acceptance as a
normal pattern of action may mark the greatest event in human history since
the invention of agriculture, and perhaps in nonhuman terrestrial history as
well.
Almost at once the new situation forced the crystallization of the
novel concept of ecology; indeed, the word ecology first appeared in the
English language in 1873. Today, less than a century later, the impact of our
race upon the environment has so increased in force that it has changed in
essence. When the first cannons were fired, in the early 14th century, they
affected ecology by sending workers scrambling to the forests and
mountains for more potash, sulphur, iron ore, and charcoal, with some
resulting erosion and deforestation. Hydrogen bombs are of a different
order: a war fought with them might alter the genetics of all life on this
planet. By 1285 London had a smog problem arising from the burning of

1